As previously mentioned, we tested two different kits in our NBAF project. The first is the Illumina Tru-Seq Nano library preparation kit (FC-121-4001), which recommends a starting DNA quantity of 100 ng. We also used NEB‘s NEBNext Ultra library preparation kit for Illumina (E7370S), which has been optimized for as little as 5 ng of starting DNA. The DNA for each kit was aliquoted into separate tubes, and each sonicated separately just prior to library preparation, using the same sonication profile for both aliquots. The amounts of DNA given below are the quantity that went into the initial library preparation, after DNA repair; this starting point varied according to whether libraries were sonicated or not.
For one collection (1940 herbarium) there was extremely little DNA – for this, only the NEB library was made.
Year | Material type | Tissue | Extract | DNA repair | Sonicat. cycles | Post sonicat. cleanup | Size select | TruSeq ng | NEB ng | Library no. |
2009 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | no | 8 | yes | normal | 101 | 100 | 1- |
2009 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | 8 | yes | normal | 101 | 101.5 | 1+ |
2009 | Herbarium | Leaf | QiaQuick | no | 8 | yes | normal | 101 | 100 | 2- |
2009 | Herbarium | Leaf | QiaQuick | yes | 8 | yes | normal | 70.6 | 28.2 | 2+ |
2009 | Silica | Leaf | DNeasy | no | 8 | yes | normal | 101 | 100 | 3- |
2009 | Silica | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | 8 | yes | normal | 101 | 94 | 3+ |
2004 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | 3 | yes | normal | 101 | 100 | 9+ |
2004 | Herbarium | Leaf | both | yes | 3 | yes | normal | 70.6 | 39.1 | 10+ |
1948 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | none | — | modified | 70 | 22.9 | 5+ |
1948 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | none | — | modified | 80 | 58.8 | 6+ |
1932 | Herbarium | Flower | DNeasy | yes | none | — | modified | 80 | 80 | 11+a |
1932 | Herbarium | Flower | DNeasy | yes | none | — | modified | 80 | 80 | 11+b |
1932 | Herbarium | Flower | DNeasy | yes | none | — | modified | 40 | — | 11+b2 |
1932 | Herbarium | Flower | DNeasy | yes | none | — | none | — | 40 | 11+bv2 |
1932 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | 3 | yes | normal | 101 | 100 | 12+ |
1840 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | none | — | none | — | 5 | 8+ |
1840 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | none | — | none | — | very low | 7+ |
1835 | Herbarium | Leaf | DNeasy | yes | 1 | no | modified | 40.4 | 16 | 13+ |
For one of the 1840 library preparations, the quantity of DNA in the aliquot was too low to measure using a Qubit dsDNA high sensitivity kit.
James A. Nicholls, R. Toby Pennington, Erik J.M. Koenen, Colin E. Hughes, Jack Hearn, Lynsey Bunnefeld, Kyle G. Dexter, Graham N. Stone & Catherine A. Kidner. 2015. Using targeted enrichment of nuclear genes to increase phylogenetic resolution in the neotropical rain forest genus Inga (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 710. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00710
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. I. What it’s all about. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/16411
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. II. Inga. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/16427
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. III. The samples. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/16441
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. IV. DNA. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/16470
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. V. Fragmenting the DNA. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/16525
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. VI. Size Selection. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/16645
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. VII. Comparisons. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/16737
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. VIII. Amplification. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/16788
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. IX. Hybrid capture. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/17298
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. X. An update. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/20751
Capturing Genes from Herbaria. XI. Some metagenomics of a herbarium specimen. http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/20817